Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the writ petitioner should be permitted to pursue an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal under Section 86 of the Finance Act, 1994 and whether interim coercive action against the petitioner should be restrained pending disposal of such appeal.
Analysis: The appellate remedy under Section 86 of the Finance Act, 1994 is available to the petitioner to challenge the Order-in-Original and the Order-in-Appeal. The appellate forum has jurisdiction to consider condonation of any delay that occurred in filing the appeal. The petitioner has placed on record medical evidence prima facie indicating that non-appearance before the Commissioner (Appeals) was due to serious ill-health. In view of these circumstances and for ends of justice, an opportunity to file and have the appeal considered by the Appellate Tribunal is appropriate. Considering the balance of convenience and the nature of relief sought, interim restraint on coercive measures is warranted until the Appellate Tribunal disposes of the appeal.
Conclusion: The writ petition is disposed directing the petitioner to file an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal under Section 86 of the Finance Act, 1994 within six weeks and granting interim protection by restraining coercive action until the appeal is disposed. This disposition is in favour of the petitioner (assessee).