1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Obligation to Make Submissions: petitioner must appear before AO, furnish information and make full submissions; discretionary review refused.</h1> Challenge concerned validity of reopening an assessment where the petitioner delayed responding and had sought time to reply but did not furnish ... Validity of reopening of assessment - Obligation to make submissions before the AO - petitioner's requests for time to reply, the filing of a delayed reply - AO to consider submissions and proceed in accordance with law As decided by HC petition was filed after a considerable lapse of time of one and half years from the order, that the petitioner had sought time to reply and had not furnished the information sought under Section 142(1). Given these facts and the nature of the controversy, the Court declined to decide the substantive validity of the notices and order. Instead, the petitioner was directed to appear before the Assessing Officer, make full factual and legal submissions and furnish the information called for HELD THAT:- We do not find a good ground to interfere with the impugned order/judgment in exercise of our jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, the special leave petition stands dismissed. Outcome: Special Leave Petition dismissed [No detailed order].