Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether call centre services provided by the respondent to British Airways UK qualify as "export of services" under Rule 3(2) of the Export of Service Rules, 2005 thereby entitling the respondent to rebate under Rule 5 and Notification No.11/2005-ST dated 19.04.2005 for the relevant period.
Analysis: The issue requires examination of the two conditions in Rule 3(2) of the Export of Service Rules, 2005: (a) that the service is provided from India and used outside India, and (b) that payment is received in convertible foreign exchange. The phrase "used outside India" has been interpreted by departmental circulars dated 24.02.2009 and 13.05.2011 to mean effective use and enjoyment of the service outside India. Previous Tribunal decisions addressing similar call centre services and the interpretation of place of use, including Paul Merchants Ltd., Vodafone Essar Cellular Ltd., Microsoft Corporation (I) Pvt. Ltd., and the Larger Bench decision in Arcelor Mittal Stainless (I) Pvt. Ltd., uphold that the recipient of service is the person at whose instance and expense the service is provided and that effective use and enjoyment by an overseas recipient satisfies the "used outside India" condition. The agreement between the parties shows services were provided to and paid by British Airways UK and had direct impact on BA UK operations; payment was in convertible foreign exchange. The Tribunal in earlier orders on adjacent periods and the absence of challenge or stay of those decisions support consistency of conclusion for the present period.
Conclusion: The call centre services provided by the respondent to British Airways UK qualify as export of services under Rule 3(2) of the Export of Service Rules, 2005 and the respondent is entitled to the rebate under Rule 5 of the Export of Service Rules, 2005 read with Notification No.11/2005-ST dated 19.04.2005. The Revenue's appeal is dismissed and the impugned order is upheld in favour of the assessee.