Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Central Excise

        2026 (3) TMI 407 - AT - Central Excise

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Fruit juice drink classification: products with at least 5% juice fall under the juice based tariff; related environmental services qualify for cenvat credit. Products containing not less than 5% fruit juice qualify as fruit juice based drinks and are classifiable under Tariff Item No. 2202 90 20, applying the ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                          Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                            Fruit juice drink classification: products with at least 5% juice fall under the juice based tariff; related environmental services qualify for cenvat credit.

                            Products containing not less than 5% fruit juice qualify as fruit juice based drinks and are classifiable under Tariff Item No. 2202 90 20, applying the common parlance test and regulatory definitions; classification is allowed in favour of the assessee. Services procured for disposal of industrial waste and for conducting air pollution surveys are input services within the scope of the Cenvat Credit Rules and eligible for cenvat credit because they are integrally connected to manufacture and to compliance with environmental requirements. Consequentially, demands, invocation of the extended period and penalties dependent on those substantive demands are not sustainable where issues are interpretational and no culpable suppression is shown.




                            Issues: (i) Whether Minute Maid Nimbu Fresh containing at least 5% fruit juice is classifiable under Tariff Item No. 2202 90 20 rather than 2202 10 20; (ii) Whether cenvat credit is allowable on services for disposal of waste and on services for conducting air-pollution survey around the factory; (iii) Whether demands, extended period invocation and penalties survive if classification and credit demands fail.

                            Issue (i): Classification of Minute Maid Nimbu Fresh containing at least 5% fruit juice under Tariff Item No. 2202 90 20 or under Tariff Item No. 2202 10 20.

                            Analysis: The Tribunal applied both the common parlance test and the relevant regulatory definitions indicating that products with fruit juice content not less than 5% satisfy the definition of fruit juice based drinks and therefore fall within Tariff Item No. 2202 90 20; the decision follows the larger bench precedent that examined Regulation-based definitions and total soluble solids thresholds in determining classification.

                            Conclusion: Classification in favour of the assessee; Minute Maid Nimbu Fresh containing at least 5% fruit juice is classifiable under Tariff Item No. 2202 90 20.

                            Issue (ii): Entitlement to cenvat credit on services for disposal of industrial waste and on services for conducting air-pollution survey.

                            Analysis: The Tribunal applied Rule 2(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 and relevant authority precedent holding that services procured to comply with environmental or pollution control directions are input services used directly or indirectly in relation to manufacture; the air-pollution survey conducted to maintain product quality and to comply with principals' requirements was held to be integrally connected to manufacture and thus within the scope of input services.

                            Conclusion: Cenvat credit allowable to the assessee on services for disposal of waste and on the air-pollution survey; credit demands in favour of Revenue not sustained.

                            Issue (iii): Validity of extended period invocation, quantification errors and imposition of penalties where classification and credit demands fail.

                            Analysis: The Tribunal considered that extended period invocation and penalty depend on the survival of substantive duty or proof of suppression/mens rea; where classification and credit demands are rejected on merits and issues are interpretational or based on audit without culpable suppression, extended period and penalty are not sustainable.

                            Conclusion: Extended period invocation and penalties do not survive in favour of the Revenue; no penalties or extended-period recoveries sustained.

                            Final Conclusion: The substantive demands for duty and denial of cenvat credit were decided in favour of the assessee on classification and credit issues, resulting in allowance of the appeals and setting aside of the impugned orders; ancillary demands and penalties consequential on those demands were also negated.

                            Ratio Decidendi: A product containing not less than 5% fruit juice falls within Tariff Item No. 2202 90 20 as a fruit juice based drink, and services procured to comply with environmental or pollution control requirements or to maintain product quality are input services within the meaning of Rule 2(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.


                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found