Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the period of limitation for passing the final assessment order under section 144C(13) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 must be determined with reference to section 153 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (i.e., whether sections 144C and 153 are mutually inclusive) and whether the final assessment orders in the five appeals are barred by limitation.
Analysis: The Tribunal considered the competing views: the assessees relied on the Madras High Court decision in Roca Bathroom Products holding that sections 144C and 153 are mutually inclusive and that the limitation under section 153 applies to final orders under section 144C(13); the Revenue relied on the proposition that section 144C is a self-contained code with non-obstante language excluding other provisions, and also urged judicial restraint because the Supreme Court has referred the issue to a larger Bench and passed interim directions affecting citation of certain High Court reasoning. The Tribunal examined the reasoning in Roca Bathroom Products and subsequent appellate and coordinate-bench orders which interpret the timelines under sections 144C and 153 as inter-dependent, noting that section 144C contains inbuilt timelines but does not oust the outer limit prescribed by section 153. The Tribunal then applied the legal framework to the undisputed date-sheets for the five assessment years and found that in each case the final assessment order was passed after the outer limitation date computed with reference to section 153; accordingly those final orders were time-barred.
Conclusion: The final assessment orders for all five appeals are barred by limitation and are quashed; the appeals are therefore allowed in favour of the assessees.