Proceeds of crime limited to profit element; provisional attachment confirmed only to quantified illicit profit after assessment.

The article addresses provisional attachment under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act concerning receipts for supply of additional goods. It reasons that where contractual supplies generate legitimate receipts covering manufacturing costs and a separate illicit advantage, the attachment regime must be confined to the portion that reasonably represents proceeds of crime (for example the profit element). The Tribunal directed the respondent to quantify the illicit portion by isolating profit or another appropriate measure and to confirm provisional attachment only to that quantified amount within four weeks, leaving the remainder free from treatment as proceeds of crime.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the provisional attachment and confirmation of the entire sum received by the appellant for supply of 11 additional bogey frames (Rs. 1,80,77,400.00 / Rs. 1,88,77,400/- as noted) can be treated wholly as proceeds of crime; (ii) Whether the provisional attachment should be modified or quantified in light of legitimate manufacturing costs and contractual terms.

Issue (i): Whether the entire amount received for supply of 11 additional bogey frames is proceeds of crime and therefore liable to provisional attachment and confirmation under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.

Analysis: The record includes FIR and investigation material indicating payment of alleged bribe (Rs. 1,80,000/-) and a chain of transactions linked to the award of additional supply. A prima facie case for the offences alleged exists and the matter remains pending criminally. However, the supplies were performed under a contract containing an express clause permitting enhancement up to 30% and the additional bogey frames involved real manufacturing costs and consideration paid by the contracting authority. The attachment regime must account for the distinction between illicit gain attributable to criminal activity and legitimate business receipts that cover cost of production.

Conclusion: The Tribunal holds that the entire amount received for the additional 11 bogey frames cannot be treated wholly as proceeds of crime; provisional attachment of the entire sum is not warranted.

Issue (ii): Whether and how the provisional attachment should be quantified or modified given legitimate costs and contractual entitlement.

Analysis: A balanced and equitable approach is required where part of the gross receipts represents legitimate costs of manufacture and supply while only the illicitly obtained profit component can be equated to proceeds of crime. The respondent is to assess and quantify the portion properly to be regarded as proceeds of crime rather than treating the full contract value as such. A limited period is appropriate for such re-quantification to avoid prolonged uncertainty.

Conclusion: The Tribunal directs that the proceeds of crime be quantified by the respondent by isolating the profit element (or other appropriate measure) from the total value received for the 11 additional bogey frames, and that the provisional attachment be confirmed only to the extent of that quantified proceeds of crime. The respondent is directed to complete the quantification within four weeks from receipt of the order.

Final Conclusion: The appeal is partly allowed by modifying the scope of the provisional attachment - the attachment confirmed only to the extent of the quantified proceeds of crime (profit component) after respondent's assessment within four weeks; the remainder of the attached amount shall not be treated as proceeds of crime for confirmation purposes.

Ratio Decidendi: Where a contracted supply generates both legitimate business receipts covering production costs and an alleged illicit advantage, provisional attachment under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 must be confined to the portion that reasonably represents proceeds of crime (for example the profit element), and not the entire gross contract value.

---