Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a reference made at the instance of the applicant could be withdrawn, and whether the Court could decline to answer the referred questions when the applicant stated that it was no longer interested in pursuing the reference.
Analysis: A reference under Section 61(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 is ordinarily required to be answered, but the Court held that the party at whose instance the reference was made has no absolute right to withdraw it once made. At the same time, where that party states that it does not wish to pursue the reference and the other side is also not interested in having the questions answered, the Court is not obliged to decide the reference on merits and may decline to answer the questions, keeping them open for decision in an appropriate case.
Conclusion: The reference could not be withdrawn as of right, but the Court declined to answer the referred questions and disposed of the matter.
Ratio Decidendi: A party cannot unilaterally withdraw a reference once made by the Tribunal, but the Court may decline to answer the referred questions where the party at whose instance the reference was made no longer wishes to pursue it and no hearing on merits is effectively required.