Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned order dated 11.11.2025 in Form GST DRC-07 is invalid on the ground that the petitioner's detailed reply in Form GST DRC-06 was not considered and that the summary in Form GST DRC-01 cannot substitute for a detailed show cause notice.
Analysis: The Court examined the impugned order and found that the petitioner had submitted a detailed reply which was considered by the authority, and that the demand in Form GST DRC-01 was based on an intimation in Form GST DRC-01A attached to the show cause proceedings. The Court distinguished the decision in Shambu Prasad (Gauhati) as not applicable on the facts, noting that the present proceedings involved a detailed reply and a meritorious adjudication. The Court also observed that the petitioner approached the Court within the period for filing an appeal under Section 107 of the respective GST enactments and addressed the question of limitation by granting liberty to file an appeal.
Conclusion: The writ petition is dismissed; the impugned order stands upheld and the petitioner is not entitled to relief in this Court. The petitioner is granted liberty to file an appeal before the Appellate Authority within thirty days and the Appellate Authority is directed to entertain and dispose of the appeal on merits notwithstanding limitation.