Input tax credit entitlement re-evaluated under amended statutory framework, remand ordered with conditional compliance and hearing rights.

Remittance for fresh adjudication is directed where denial of input tax credit was premised on belated availment and subsequent statutory insertions alter entitlement assessment; the authority must re-examine entitlement on merits under the amended framework while preserving the finding on belated availment. Procedural safeguards require the taxpayer to file a reply within 30 days and pay amounts due for delayed return filing within the same period before fresh adjudication; bank attachment is conditionally lifted subject to compliance and absence of other arrears. A fresh merits order must follow after affording an opportunity of hearing.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the impugned order confirming denial of input tax credit and related demands is sustainable in view of the statutory insertion of Sections 16(5) and 16(6) and whether the writ petition merits interference by remand for fresh consideration.

Analysis: The Court examined whether the assessment confirming reversal of input tax credit and consequent demands rested solely on belated availment under Section 16(4), and whether the subsequent statutory provisions (Sections 16(5) and 16(6)) require reevaluation of the taxpayer's entitlement. The Court considered the scope of the earlier order-in-original and the necessity of allowing the authority to re-examine entitlement on merits while preserving the consequence of belated availment. The Court also addressed procedural fairness by requiring filing of a proper reply and payment of amounts due for delayed return filing before fresh adjudication, and by conditioning lifting of bank attachment on compliance and absence of other arrears.

Conclusion: The matter is remitted to the tax authority for fresh adjudication of entitlement to input tax credit (excepting the issue of belated availment), subject to the petitioner filing a reply within 30 days and paying amounts due for late return filing within the same period; bank attachment is lifted conditionally. A fresh order on merits shall be passed after affording the petitioner an opportunity of hearing.

Ratio Decidendi: Where a tax authority's confirmation of denial of input tax credit is based on belated availment and statutory amendments alter the entitlement framework, judicial interference by remand for fresh consideration is appropriate to enable the authority to apply the amended statutory provisions while preserving procedural safeguards.

---