Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the order of the CIT(A) deleting the addition of Rs. 1,55,34,265/- made under Section 69A read with Section 115BBE of the Income-tax Act, 1961, by accepting the explanation of rotation of funds due to the bank's auto sweep facility and retirement benefits as source, is sustainable.
Analysis: The appellate authority examined bank statements, documents regarding retirement benefits, and evidence showing joint accounts and recurring debits and credits attributable to an auto sweep/fixed deposit facility. The appellate authority evaluated whether the assessee discharged the evidentiary burden to demonstrate genuineness and source of the credited amounts, and whether the assessing officer had properly analysed and verified the transaction pattern before making additions under the cited provisions. The appellate authority also considered the admissibility and relevance of retirement benefit documents and joint account records in establishing source and nature of transactions.
Conclusion: The deletion of the addition is upheld and the addition made under Section 69A read with Section 115BBE of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is not sustained; the assessing officer's order is set aside in respect of the challenged addition.