Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether business auxiliary services rendered by the assessee to an overseas group entity qualify as export of services under the Export of Services Rules, 2005 and therefore are not taxable under Section 65(19) sub-clause (iv) of the Finance Act, 1994.
Analysis: The services comprised facilitation/commission for overseas suppliers who contracted directly with Indian customers, with consideration received in convertible foreign exchange. Rule 3(1)(iii) of the Export of Services Rules, 2005 and Circular No. 111/5/2009 recognise the location of the service receiver as the relevant criterion for export of services. The question was authoritatively addressed by the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Service Tax-III v. Vodafone India Limited (2025), which affirmed that where the receiver of the service is located outside India, the activity falls within export of services and is not taxable even if the eventual use or performance has connection with India; the decision in A.T.E. Enterprises was similarly treated as covered by the Supreme Court's disposal. Applying these principles to the facts where the overseas group entity was the contractual recipient and payer, the services meet the export of services criteria under the Export of Services Rules, 2005.
Conclusion: The issue is decided in favour of the respondent (assessee): the business auxiliary services rendered to the overseas entity qualify as export of services and are not exigible to service tax under Section 65(19) sub-clause (iv) of the Finance Act, 1994.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the receiver of services is located outside India, the activity qualifies as export of services under Rule 3(1)(iii) of the Export of Services Rules, 2005, and such services are not taxable under Section 65(19) sub-clause (iv) of the Finance Act, 1994.