Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the reopening of assessment under Sections 147/148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was valid where the reassessment originated from documents seized during a search of a third party, or whether the assessment proceedings were required to be initiated under Section 153C read with Section 153A of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The material on record shows that incriminating documents were seized during a search under Section 132 and that those documents related to the assessee though seized from a third party. The statutory scheme of Sections 153A and 153C begins with a non-obstante clause which gives the special procedure in search/requisition cases overriding the general reassessment provisions in Sections 147/148. Jurisprudence relied upon establishes that where incriminating material emanates from search proceedings and pertains to persons other than the searched person, the assessing officer is required to proceed under Section 153C read with Section 153A and cannot instead invoke Sections 147/148; failure to follow the special procedure renders any notice under Section 148 and consequent assessment under Section 147 without jurisdiction. The facts show an initial invocation of Section 153C which was dropped and a subsequent initiation under Section 148; on these facts the special procedure under Sections 153A/153C was applicable and was not followed.
Conclusion: Reopening under Sections 147/148 was void for lack of jurisdiction; the notice under Section 148 and all consequential actions are quashed and the appeal is allowed in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where incriminating material seized in a search pertains to a person other than the searched person, the assessing officer must invoke Section 153C read with Section 153A of the Income-tax Act, 1961; the non-obstante clause therein precludes proceeding under Sections 147/148 in such circumstances and any reassessment initiated under Sections 147/148 on the basis of such seized material is void.