Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the First Information Report alleging cheating, conspiracy, and corruption could be quashed on the basis that the materials collected did not disclose deception at the inception, the alleged advances and recoveries were supported by documents, and the continuation of investigation would amount to a roving inquiry.
Analysis: The materials placed on record, including documents gathered during the preliminary enquiry, the forensic audit material, the communications from the lending banks, and the conduct of the consortium, did not show any false representation or dishonest intention at the inception of the transaction. The allegations essentially disclosed a commercial lending dispute and recovery issues, not the essential ingredients of cheating. The record also did not show any identifiable public servant or bank official against whom a concrete allegation of collusion or misconduct had been made. In the absence of a prima facie case of deception, dishonest inducement, or intentional wrongful loss, continuation of the criminal process would serve only as a fishing exercise.
Conclusion: The First Information Report could not be allowed to continue and was liable to be quashed.