Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondent should be directed to consider and dispose of the petitioner's application under Section 161 of the GST enactments seeking rectification of the impugned assessment order.
Analysis: The Court recorded that the petitioner filed an application under Section 161 for rectification which remained undecided. The respondent's counsel stated that the application would be considered and disposed of on merits. The petitioner had also filed substantive replies to the show cause proceedings regarding input tax credit, but the Court did not undertake adjudication of the tax demand. Instead, the Court confined itself to ensuring the statutory rectification remedy is adjudicated promptly by the administrative authority.
Conclusion: The respondent is directed to consider and dispose of the petitioner's rectification application under Section 161 on merits within 30 days. The writ petition is disposed of with the above direction.