Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a consolidated satisfaction note recorded for multiple assessment years, without year-wise identification of incriminating material, validly permits initiation of proceedings under Section 153C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and consequent framing of assessments for the years under challenge.
Analysis: The statutory scheme requires that action under Section 153C proceed upon satisfaction that material received from a searched person is likely to have a bearing on the determination of total income of the other person for the specific assessment year(s) sought to be reopened. A satisfaction note that aggregates multiple years without identifying year-wise incriminating material fails to evidence the requisite formation of opinion that the seized material is likely to impact a particular assessment year. Where the satisfaction note does not identify amounts or material by assessment year, the foundational requirement for assuming jurisdiction under Section 153C is not met. The consequence of an invalid satisfaction note is that abatement and re-opening under Section 153C cannot be sustained and the resultant assessment orders lack jurisdictional basis.
Conclusion: The consolidated satisfaction note recorded for multiple assessment years without year-wise identification of incriminating material is invalid and fatal to the assumption of jurisdiction under Section 153C of the Income-tax Act, 1961; assessments framed on that basis are quashed.