Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sales tax collected and retained by an industrial undertaking under a state capital investment incentive policy (allowing retention of sales tax up to the amount of capital investment) constitutes a capital receipt or a revenue receipt for the purposes of income-tax assessment for the assessment year 2007-08.
Analysis: Prior decisions of a High Court addressed an identical exemption scheme and concluded that sales tax collected and retained under the policy is a capital receipt. Those High Court decisions were not sustained by successful challenge in the Supreme Court, as the appeals filed by Revenue were dismissed. The scheme allowed retention of sales tax equal to capital investment for a fixed period and the facts and legal questions in the present appeals materially correspond to those earlier decisions. On that basis, the applicable legal framework and consistent precedent support classification of the retained sales tax as capital receipt rather than taxable revenue receipt.
Conclusion: The issue is answered against Revenue and in favour of the assessee: the sales tax collected and retained under the capital investment incentive policy is a capital receipt and not includible as taxable revenue for the assessment year in question.
Ratio Decidendi: Sales tax amounts retained under a state capital investment incentive policy, to the extent permitted as retention equal to capital investment, constitute capital receipts and are not taxable as revenue receipts where the scheme and facts are materially identical to earlier authoritative decisions which have withstood challenge.