Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the notice under Section 148 read with Section 149 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for assessment year 2017-18 was validly issued where the alleged income escaping assessment shown in the notice was Rs. 35,00,000 which is below the threshold of Rs. 50,00,000 for reopening assessments beyond three assessment years.
Analysis: The issue was determined on admitted facts in the notice and the approval proforma. The approval proforma records the escaped income as Rs. 35,00,000 and invokes reopening under Section 149(1)(b) and Section 149(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for a period beyond three years but not exceeding ten years. The statutory framework requires that reopening beyond three years is permissible only where the alleged escaped income exceeds the prescribed monetary threshold. The Assessing Officer and the approving authority did not rely on any composite or cumulative calculation across multiple assessment years to justify invocation of the extended limitation; instead the recorded figure for the relevant assessment year falls below the statutory threshold. On these admitted facts, the assumption of jurisdiction for reopening is vitiated.
Conclusion: The notice under Section 148 read with Section 149 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is invalid insofar as the alleged escaped income for AY 2017-18 is Rs. 35,00,000 which is below the Rs. 50,00,000 threshold required to reopen assessments beyond three years; accordingly the assessment order is quashed and the appeal is allowed in favour of the assessee.