Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interim relief in the form of stay of the impugned order dated 23 August, 2024 and suspension of coercive measures should be granted pending final disposal of the petition challenging Notifications issued under Section 168A of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
Analysis: The Court noted that identical legal questions are pending consideration in a related writ petition before this Court and that the point raised is also under consideration before the Supreme Court in connected proceedings. The petition challenges the validity of Notifications issued under Section 168A of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 on grounds including alleged non-compliance with the requirement of recommendation by the GST Council and consequent vires of extension of limitation for actions under Section 73 of the CGST Act. In view of the pending proceedings on identical questions in Shyam Udyog and before the Supreme Court in the connected matter, the Court considered it appropriate to grant interim relief to preserve the status quo and prevent irreparable prejudice to the petitioner pending final adjudication.
Conclusion: Interim relief is granted: the impugned order dated 23 August, 2024 is stayed and any coercive measures including blocking of the electronic credit ledger and any attachments are stayed and/or vacated pending final disposal of the petition.