Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2026 (2) TMI 1278 - AT - Service Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Interest calculation under section 75 requires period wise rates with a three percent reduction; timely deposits can negate balance interest and penalties. Where service tax collected within a cum tax price was not remitted, interest must be computed period wise using rates in successive notifications with ...
                          Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                              Interest calculation under section 75 requires period wise rates with a three percent reduction; timely deposits can negate balance interest and penalties.

                              Where service tax collected within a cum tax price was not remitted, interest must be computed period wise using rates in successive notifications with the statutory three percent reduction for small taxpayers; applying the correct notification entries and accounting for payments already made, the tribunal found the balance interest demand unsustainable and set it aside. Separately, where the assessee deposited tax, major portions of interest and the prescribed reduced penalty within the relevant period and payments were appropriately appropriated, confirmed penalties and an additional penalty were disallowed and the penalty demand set aside.




                              Issues: (i) Whether the balance interest (net) on confirmed service tax is demandable; (ii) Whether the balance penalties under section 78 and section 77(2) of the Finance Act, 1994 are imposable on the appellant.

                              Issue (i): Whether the balance interest of Rs.57,340/- (net) on service tax of Rs.1,11,365/- as confirmed under the Order-in-Original is demandable.

                              Analysis: The dispute concerned computation of interest under section 75 of the Finance Act, 1994 read with successive notifications (including Notification Nos.14/2011,12/2014 and 13/2016) and the proviso reducing interest by three percent for small taxpayers. The authorities held that the appellant had charged a cum-tax price and failed to remit amounts to the Government; hence interest rates prescribed in the notifications apply for the respective periods with applicable reduction under section 75. The Tribunal examined the periods and rates, acknowledged payments already made by the appellant (including substantial portion of interest), and recalculated interest applying the correct serial entry of the notification for short payment cases, concluding that the remaining interest demanded could not be sustained as originally confirmed.

                              Conclusion: The balance interest of Rs.57,340/- demanded in the impugned order is not sustained and the demand as confirmed is set aside in the appellant's favour.

                              Issue (ii): Whether the balance penalty of Rs.94,665/- under section 78 and Rs.2,000/- under section 77(2) of the Finance Act, 1994 are imposable on the appellant.

                              Analysis: The adjudicating authority had imposed equal penalty under section 78 and an additional penalty under section 77(2). The appellant paid tax, a major portion of interest and a reduced penalty amount within 30 days of the show cause notice and claimed benefit under the proviso to section 78. The Tribunal examined the timing and nature of deposits, appropriation of payments, and the proviso's applicability for single and timely deposits. Having found that the appellant deposited the tax, major portion of interest and 15% penalty within the relevant period and in view of the corrected interest calculation and payments, the Tribunal held that the confirmed penalties and additional penalty could not be upheld as imposed in the impugned order and the impugned order on penalties lacks merit.

                              Conclusion: The confirmed differential penalties as imposed in the impugned order are not sustained and the impugned order is set aside; the appeal is allowed in respect of penalties in favour of the appellant.

                              Final Conclusion: The Tribunal allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned Order-in-Appeal and the Order-in-Original to the extent they confirmed the challenged interest and penalties, and thereby ruled overall in favour of the assessee.

                              Ratio Decidendi: Where service tax is collected as part of a cum-tax price but not remitted, interest is to be computed period-wise as per the notifications under section 75 (with the statutory three percent reduction for small taxpayers); where the assessee has deposited the tax and substantial portions of interest and prescribed reduced penalty within the stipulated period, the confirmed demand for remaining interest/penalty calculated under the impugned orders may be set aside.


                              Full Summary is available for active users!
                              Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                              Topics

                              ActsIncome Tax
                              No Records Found