Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imposition of a "General Penalty" under Section 125 of the respective GST enactments can be sustained where a concessional "Late Fee" under Section 47 of the respective GST enactments has been levied/accepted in terms of the notifications allowing reduced late fee.
Analysis: The Court examined the challenge to the general penalty imposed for non-filing of annual returns in light of the decision in Ms. Kandan Hardware Mart (batch decision dated 02.01.2026), which held that where taxpayers filed annual returns within the period permitted by the notifications granting concessional late fee, the late fee under Section 47(2) is penal in nature. The ratio adopted in that decision is that a penal late fee levied at a concessional rate under the notifications operates as the penalty for the default, and therefore there is no scope to impose an additional general penalty under Section 125 of the GST enactments over and above the late fee so levied. The petitioner in the present writ petition challenged only the imposition of the general penalty; the proposal for late fee was dropped or adjusted in accordance with the notifications permitting concessional payment.
Conclusion: Impugned order quashed insofar as it relates to levy of the general penalty under Section 125 of the respective GST enactments; petition allowed and consequential relief granted in favour of the assessee.