Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition of Rs. 66,00,000 as unexplained cash deposits during the demonetisation period can be sustained against the assessee who claims the deposits were from cash sales.
Analysis: The assessee is a trader whose audited books, trading account showing turnover, VAT returns, cash book entries, and sales and purchase registers were placed on record. Survey disclosed substantial stock but no adverse finding was recorded by the assessing authority against the stock. The assessing officer treated an unusually high monthly turnover and the cash deposits as indicia of unaccounted income and made an addition. On the facts, the documentary evidence showing recorded cash sales and accepted turnover, absence of any noted cash shortage, and lack of contradictory evidence by the revenue undermine making an addition based on mere assumption. The legal framework requires that additions not be made on conjecture and that unexplained deposits be established as income if not satisfactorily explained by the assessee; where supporting books and records and external acceptance (such as VAT acceptance) substantiate the claimed source, the addition is not sustainable.
Conclusion: The addition of Rs. 66,00,000 as unexplained cash deposits is deleted and the assessing officer is directed to recompute the income accordingly.