Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether credit on items such as welding electrodes, jointing sheets and other items used for maintenance, repair, upkeep or fabrication of plant and machinery is admissible as being "used in or in relation to manufacture".
Analysis: The Court examined the scope of the expression "used in or in relation to manufacture" and applied settled legal principles holding that the phrase has wide import and includes items used in the process of manufacture whether directly or indirectly and whether contained in the final product or not. The Court considered prior authority which held that items used for maintenance, repair, upkeep or fabrication of plant and machinery are encompassed within items "used in" manufacture and therefore qualify for credit.
Conclusion: Credit on welding electrodes and similar items used for maintenance, repair, upkeep or fabrication of plant and machinery is admissible; the appeals are allowed in terms of the cited judgment.
Ratio Decidendi: The expression "used in or in relation to manufacture" is to be interpreted broadly to include all items used in the process of manufacture (directly or indirectly), including items used for maintenance, repair, upkeep or fabrication of plant and machinery, and such items qualify for input credit.