Revisional power under Section 263: interest on state-provided revolving funds held as income from other sources, not 80P deduction.

Revisional jurisdiction under section 263 was justified where the Assessing Officer did not examine the source and character of revolving funds provided by the State Government; interest earned on short-term fixed deposits of those government-provided funds placed in commercial banks was characterised as income from other sources rather than income incidental to cooperative marketing activities, and thus not deductible under section 80P(2)(a)(iii) and (iv). Precedents cited for the assessee were distinguished on facts where the AO had considered similar issues, and the assessment was directed to be reopened for fresh consideration.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Pr. CIT rightly exercised revisional power under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 by holding that interest earned on short-term fixed deposits of funds provided by the State Government (revolving fund) does not qualify for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(iii) & (iv) and is taxable as income from other sources, thereby rendering the assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of Revenue.

Analysis: The assessee is a state-level cooperative federation which received a revolving fund from the State Government for purchase operations; the fund remained temporarily idle and was placed in fixed deposits earning interest. The issue turns on the legal characterisation of the funds (government revolving fund versus members' contributions) and whether the interest is incidental to the cooperative's core activities so as to qualify for deduction under the statutory provisions for cooperative societies. The revisional jurisdiction under section 263 permits intervention where the assessment order is found to be erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue; such intervention is appropriate where material factual aspects (source and character of the funds and treatment of interest) were not examined by the Assessing Officer. The tribunal examined the record, including the admitted fact that the funds originated from the State Government and were kept in commercial banks, and noted absence of AO scrutiny on this aspect during assessment proceedings. Precedents cited by the assessee were distinguished on facts where the AO had examined similar issues; the tribunal found those authorities inapplicable to the present factual matrix. Having regard to the factual finding that the funds were government-provided revolving funds and the interest arose from placement in commercial banks rather than contributions of members or activities of marketing agricultural produce, the interest was held to fall within the scope of income from other sources and not eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(iii) & (iv).

Conclusion: The revisional action under section 263 is justified and the Pr. CIT's direction to set aside the assessment for fresh consideration is upheld; the appeal is dismissed against the assessee.

---