Service tax valuation: separately billed spare parts are excluded, and vehicle painting can qualify as works contract service.

Where repair and maintenance invoices separately disclose spare parts and labour, the value of spare parts sold on payment of VAT is excluded from the taxable service value for service tax. The service component alone remains taxable, so a composite levy on the full invoice value is not sustainable on these facts. Vehicle painting work using paints purchased on VAT payment and executed with the appellant's labour is treated as works contract service, which preserves entitlement to abatement under the Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006. The confirmed demands were therefore set aside and the tax dispute was decided in favour of the appellant.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the value of spare parts separately billed in invoices for repair and maintenance of vehicles could be included in the taxable value of service for levy of service tax. (ii) Whether the vehicle painting activity, involving use of paints purchased on payment of VAT and labour, was classifiable as works contract service so as to entitle the appellant to abatement under the Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006.

Issue (i): Whether the value of spare parts separately billed in invoices for repair and maintenance of vehicles could be included in the taxable value of service for levy of service tax.

Analysis: The invoices showed a clear bifurcation between the price of spare parts and the labour/service component. The spare parts were separately billed and VAT was discharged on their sale, while service tax was paid on the labour element. On such facts, the transaction could not be treated as a single composite service for taxing the entire invoice value. The material value attributable to spare parts had to be excluded from the taxable value of service.

Conclusion: The inclusion of the value of spare parts in the service tax base was not sustainable and the issue was decided in favour of the appellant.

Issue (ii): Whether the vehicle painting activity, involving use of paints purchased on payment of VAT and labour, was classifiable as works contract service so as to entitle the appellant to abatement under the Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006.

Analysis: The painting work involved use of paints procured on payment of VAT and execution through the appellant's own labour. The activity therefore had the essential features of works contract service. Once the classification as a mere repair or reconditioning service was rejected, denial of abatement under the valuation rules could not stand.

Conclusion: The painting activity was held to be works contract service and the appellant was held entitled to the benefit of abatement, in favour of the appellant.

Final Conclusion: The demands confirmed in the impugned order were set aside and the appeal succeeded on the substantive tax issues.

Ratio Decidendi: Where invoices separately disclose sale of goods and service components, the value of goods sold on payment of VAT cannot be added to the taxable service value, and an activity involving supply and incorporation of materials with labour may be classified according to its true nature for purposes of valuation relief.

---