Unexplained cash credit: documentary proof and banking trail can negate Section 68 addition, leading to deletion.

Unexplained cash credit under Section 68 was contested; the tribunal examined documentary evidence showing bank transactions, income-tax returns, balance sheets and source-of-funds statements and found no specific defects identified by lower authorities. Applying the principle that adequate documentary proof and routing through banking channels can discharge the explanation for credits, the tribunal relied on relevant precedents and deleted the addition. Outcome: the addition of the challenged amount under Section 68 is set aside in favour of the assessee.

---

---

Issues: Whether the addition of Rs. 86,90,575/- made under section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on account of unexplained cash credit was rightly confirmed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).

Analysis: The assessee furnished before the assessing officer documentary evidence including income-tax returns, balance sheets, bank statements, capital accounts and computations showing source of funds and that payments were made through banking channels in respect of the amounts treated as share application money and unsecured loans. Neither the assessing officer nor the first appellate authority pointed out specific defects in those documents or conducted further enquiry, and the appellate authority affirmed the addition without addressing the documentary evidence. The Tribunal examined the documents on record, found that subscribers/lenders had adequate source of funds and that the amounts were routed through banking channels and reflected in their balance sheets, and found reliance on a series of relevant decisions of the High Court of Calcutta supporting deletion of such additions where documentary evidence suffices.

Conclusion: The addition of Rs. 86,90,575/- made under section 68 is deleted and the ground challenging the addition is allowed in favour of the assessee.

---