Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether final assessment orders passed after the timeline prescribed under section 144C(13) read with section 153 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 are time barred and without jurisdiction?
Analysis: The Tribunal considered the interplay between section 144C and section 153 of the Income tax Act, 1961. The analysis examined provisions of section 144C providing the DRP mechanism and its inbuilt timelines (including subsections 1, 4, 5, 12 and 13) alongside the outer time limits under section 153 (including subsections 2A, 3 and 4). The Tribunal relied on the reasoned decision of the Madras High Court in Roca Bathroom Products P. Ltd., which held that the provisions of sections 144C and 153 are mutually inclusive and that the outer limitation under section 153 applies to proceedings on remand including DRP stages; factual date charts supplied by the assessees (undisputed by the Revenue) showed final orders were passed after the applicable limitation dates computed under section 144C(13) read with section 153. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's contention that section 144C is an entirely self contained code excluding section 153, noting that the Madras High Court and subsequent appellate treatment treat the timelines as overlapping and that orders passed beyond the prescribed limitation are without jurisdiction.
Conclusion: The final assessment orders passed after the time prescribed under section 144C(13) read with section 153 of the Income tax Act, 1961 are time barred and without jurisdiction; the impugned final assessment orders are quashed, and the appeals are allowed in favour of the assessees.