Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the writ petition challenging the refund rejection order in FORM-GST-RFD-06 dated 13.05.2025 and the vires of Circular No.125/44/2019-GST can be entertained, or the petitioner must be relegated to the appellate remedy under Section 107(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
Analysis: The refund rejection order dated 13.05.2025 was issued after a show cause notice dated 24.04.2025 issued in terms of Section 169(1)(d) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The petitioner did not respond to the show cause notice and raised multiple contentions challenging the grounds of rejection as well as the vires of Circular No.125/44/2019-GST. An alternative remedy of appeal under Section 107(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 was available to the petitioner and was not availed; the writ petition was pending for an extended period. The petitioner was therefore relegated to prefer an appeal, with liberty to seek delay condonation and with the appellate authority being directed to consider the grounds pursued before the writ forum within the bounds of law and in a reasonable time.
Conclusion: The writ petition is dismissed and the petitioner is directed to prefer an appeal under Section 107(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 within two weeks with a delay condonation application; the appellate authority shall consider the grounds of fact and law, including any challenge to Circular No.125/44/2019-GST, in accordance with law and within a reasonable time.