Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the double disallowance/addition of Rs. 8,54,970/- (disallowed by the assessee in the return and again by the CPC in intimation u/s 143(1)) giving rise to a fresh demand in a rectification order u/s 154 can be treated as a matter where the doctrine of merger applies and whether the matter should be remitted to the Assessing Officer for verification of tax credits and refund adjustments.
Analysis: The assessee had itself disallowed the relevant expenditure in the return and later the CPC/Assessing Officer made a similar disallowance in intimation issued under Section 143(1). A rectification application under Section 154 was filed and a rectification order creating fresh demand was passed. The question of whether the 143(1) intimation and the subsequent 154 order operate independently or merge for purposes of challenge was examined in light of the facts that the rectification order repeats the same addition and that tax payments and refund adjustments were made by the assessee. The Tribunal found that the issue raised in the appeal is directly connected with the alleged mistake apparent on the record and that remittance to the Assessing Officer for verification of tax credits and refund adjustment is necessary for complete justice.
Conclusion: The appeal is allowed for statistical purposes and the issue is remitted to the file of the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer to consider the assessee's submissions and verify the tax payments, refund adjustments and the correctness of the disallowance under law; decision is in favour of the assessee to the extent of remand and consideration by the Assessing Officer.