Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicant, a foreign national accused in alleged GST evasion offences under Sections 132(1)(d),(e),(f),(i),(l) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, is entitled to be enlarged on bail during trial under Section 483 of B.N.S.S., 2023.
Analysis: The Court examined the nature of offences, the stage of investigation and prosecution, the character and custodial period of the applicant, and the nature of evidence. The prosecution case arises from an investigation by the CGST Anti-Evasion wing and a complaint has been filed; the alleged tax shortfall was quantified and the matter is triable by a Magistrate with maximum sentence up to five years. The Court considered earlier orders including the Apex Court direction to decide any bail application expeditiously on merits; a co-ordinate Bench had granted bail to a co-accused on similar factual/legal grounds. The Court noted absence of convincing material demonstrating a real risk of tampering with evidence, that the prosecution case is largely documentary/electronic, and that the applicant has been in custody since 26.08.2025. The Court also considered the applicant's status as a female with a young child and the visa/immigration position; immigration authorities have procedures (including X-Misc entry visa) and the applicant's visa-extension application is under process. The Court imposed conditions aimed at preventing tampering, misuse of bail, ensuring attendance at key trial stages, requiring an assurance/certificate from the applicant's embassy, restricting foreign travel without court permission, and periodic reporting of whereabouts. The Court additionally directed verification of sureties and warned of cancellation of bail on breach.
Conclusion: Bail granted to the applicant; the applicant's release on bail is allowed subject to specified conditions - conclusion is in favour of the assessee.