Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an order passed under Section 92CA(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, without supplying copies of the agreements relied upon by the authority, is vitiated for failure to provide the assessee an opportunity to defend and thereby breaches principles of natural justice and procedural fairness.
Analysis: The issue concerns whether denial of copies of relied-upon agreements impairs the assessee's ability to file a meaningful reply on transfer pricing adjustments. Consideration includes the relevance of the nature and terms of agreements to comparability and pricing, the requirement that relied documents be made available so the assessee can identify parties, contractual clauses and transactional specifics, and the possibility of redaction to protect confidentiality. The timelines for filing replies and passing final orders were assessed in light of the need to supply documents and permit effective response within expanded time limits.
Conclusion: The order passed under Section 92CA(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, without supplying copies of the relied-upon agreements is set aside. The authority is directed to supply the relied-upon agreements (with permitted redactions) and to allow specified time for filing a reply and for passing a fresh order, thereby vindicating the assessee's right to disclosure and to a fair opportunity to be heard.