CESTAT appeal dismissal for default: Rule 20 allows restoration only on sufficient cause with proof of non appearance.

Rule 20 of the CESTAT Procedure Rules empowers the Tribunal to set aside a default dismissal if the appellant later shows sufficient cause for non appearance, and to restore the proceeding accordingly. The note emphasises that adjournments are limited, cannot be granted routinely, and must be supported by serious reasons and proof for repeated non representation; failure to arrange representation after notice may justify treating the matter as abandoned. The procedural rationale includes avoidance of functus officio outcomes if an unheared party is later prejudiced. The operative effect is that proceedings may be terminated for default absent satisfactory justification, subject to Rule 20 restoration.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appeals should be dismissed for default under Rule 20 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 and having regard to the limitation on adjournments under Section 35C of the Central Excise Act, 1944, where the appellant repeatedly failed to appear despite service of notice and multiple earlier hearings.

Analysis: The appeals relate to hearings on multiple earlier dates with notice sent by RPAD to the address furnished in the appeal papers and delivered. Repeated adjournments were not sought with substantiated reasons and statutory limitation under Section 35C of the Central Excise Act, 1944 restricts adjournments to not more than three times to a party during hearing. Rule 20 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 permits dismissal of an appeal for appellant's default where the appellant does not appear when the appeal is called for hearing, while preserving the right to set aside such dismissal on demonstration of sufficient cause. Authoritative guidance condemning mechanical or routine adjournments and emphasising timely disposal of matters was applied in assessing the conduct of the proceedings. The absence of any request to decide the appeal on merits ex parte and the considerations of fairness and the appellant's opportunity to be heard were taken into account in determining whether dismissal for default was appropriate.

Conclusion: The appeals are dismissed for default under Rule 20 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982. Liberty is granted to the appellant to apply for restoration of the appeals on showing sufficient cause for non-appearance.

---