TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether repair and maintenance services provided by the Head Office in Maharashtra through Field Service Engineers (FSEs) for AMC/CMC with customers in Odisha constitute a 'place of business' in Odisha under Section 2(85) of the CGST Act; (ii) Whether temporary storage of spare parts and tool kits at the Appellant's location in Odisha constitute a 'place of business' under Section 2(85) or a 'fixed establishment' under Section 2(50) of the CGST Act; (iii) Whether the Appellant is required to obtain separate GST registration in Odisha solely on account of activities performed in Odisha.
Issue (i): Whether repair and maintenance services provided by the Head Office in Maharashtra through FSEs for AMC/CMC with customers in Odisha constitute a 'place of business' in Odisha under Section 2(85) of the CGST Act.
Analysis: Section 2(85) is inclusive and identifies (a) a place from where business is ordinarily carried on (including warehouses/godowns), (b) a place where books of account are maintained, or (c) a place where business is carried on through an agent. Section 2(71) defines the location of supplier of services as the place of business or fixed establishment most directly concerned with the supply. The facts show that contracts, invoicing, receipt of consideration and inventory control are effected from the Head Office in Maharashtra; FSEs in Odisha are employees deployed for operational execution and do not enter into contracts, maintain books or act as independent agents. The minimal, incidental post-service holding of spare parts by FSEs is operational and not evidence of a place from which business is ordinarily carried on.
Conclusion: No. The repair and maintenance services provided through FSEs do not constitute a 'place of business' in Odisha. This conclusion is in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether temporary storage of spare parts and tool kits at the Appellant's location in Odisha constitute a 'place of business' under Section 2(85) or a 'fixed establishment' under Section 2(50) of the CGST Act.
Analysis: Section 2(50) requires a sufficient degree of permanence and a suitable structure in terms of human and technical resources for supply of services. The retained spare parts are minimal, transient (returned within a short period), incidental to execution of service visits, and there is no separate administrative or inventory control in Odisha. The absence of permanence, independent structure or autonomous inventory management indicates no fixed establishment. Similarly, temporary incidental storage does not satisfy the circumstances envisaged in clause (a) of Section 2(85) as a place from which business is ordinarily carried on.
Conclusion: No. The temporary storage of spare parts and tool kits does not constitute a 'place of business' or a 'fixed establishment'. This conclusion is in favour of the assessee.
Issue (iii): Whether the Appellant is required to obtain separate GST registration in Odisha solely on account of the activities performed in Odisha.
Analysis: Sections 22 and 24 prescribe registration where a person makes taxable supplies from a State or falls within specified categories requiring compulsory registration. Given that supplies, invoicing, consideration and inventory control are effected from the Head Office in Maharashtra and the Odisha presence is limited to operational execution by employees without creating place of business or fixed establishment, supplies are made from Maharashtra. Consequently, the statutory criteria for separate registration in Odisha are not met on the basis of the activities described.
Conclusion: No. The Appellant is not required to obtain separate GST registration in Odisha solely due to the described activities. This conclusion is in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling has concluded that the Head Office's provision of AMC/CMC services through deployed employees and incidental temporary retention of spare parts in the State do not create a place of business or fixed establishment in that State and do not trigger a requirement for separate GST registration there; the Appellant's supplies are treated as made from the Head Office location.
Ratio Decidendi: Where contracts, invoicing, receipt of consideration and inventory control are effected from the principal place of business and local personnel merely execute those contracts with transient incidental storage of parts, such presence does not constitute a 'place of business' under Section 2(85) or a 'fixed establishment' under Section 2(50) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, and therefore does not mandate separate State registration under Sections 22/24.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
