Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the Court should interfere with the impugned order; (ii) Whether time for filing the statutory appeal should be extended.
Issue (i): Whether the Court should interfere with the impugned order.
Analysis: The Court found no sufficient ground to interfere with the impugned order after considering the matter on merits as placed before it.
Conclusion: In favour of Revenue.
Issue (ii): Whether time for filing the statutory appeal should be extended.
Analysis: The Court exercised its discretion to extend the period prescribed for filing the statutory appeal and specified a final extended deadline.
Conclusion: In favour of Assessee (extension of time granted until 01.03.2026).
Final Conclusion: The petition is dismissed while permitting a limited extension of time for filing the statutory appeal until 01.03.2026, thereby upholding the impugned order subject to the specified extension.