Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to adjustment of service tax wrongly credited to another unit's account and consequential waiver of demand of duty, interest and penalty despite an inadvertent accounting error.
Analysis: The amount paid from the appellant's bank account was reflected in the account of another concern due to an inadvertent mistake by the common accountant. The substantive tax payment was not doubted, and a certificate from the other concern showed that the amount was not utilised and no credit had been taken. In these circumstances, the earlier error could not justify sustaining the demand, though verification of the certificate and non-utilisation of the amount was necessary.
Conclusion: The appellant was entitled to relief against the demand of duty, interest and penalty, and the department was directed to verify the wrong credit and adjust the amount accordingly, with remand ordered for verification.