Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the order dated 18.12.2024 passed under Section 74 of the Act of 2017 can be sustained when the assessee was not provided copies of seized documents and the seized CPU and was thus deprived of a meaningful opportunity of personal hearing.
Analysis: The Court examined whether the adjudication complied with principles of natural justice by affording the assessee access to seized records and a meaningful personal hearing before confirming demand under Section 74. The factual matrix shows seizure of documents and the CPU, repeated requests by the assessee for copies and return of the CPU, and that those materials were not returned prior to conclusion of the adjudication. The respondents' affidavit and annexed correspondence indicate instructions for the assessee to approach the proper officer to obtain seized material, and the respondents contend opportunities were afforded; however, the record establishes that the seized items were not actually made available to the assessee for effective participation in the proceedings. The Court considered the effect of proceeding to confirm demand without allowing the assessee to inspect or use the seized records, and whether such procedure precluded a fair opportunity to frame defence and to prefer an effective appeal.
Conclusion: The impugned order dated 18.12.2024 is set aside for lack of a meaningful opportunity of hearing owing to non-provision of seized documents and the CPU. The impugned order shall be treated as an additional show cause notice and the assessee shall be permitted to obtain the seized documents and CPU and file a consolidated reply within two weeks of receipt; the proper officer shall furnish the seized material on application and afford an opportunity of hearing before concluding proceedings. All points on merits are left open to the adjudicating authority.