Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Review Petition seeking review of the judgment dated 20.03.2025 should be entertained despite a 208-day delay and whether the petition merits review on merits.
Analysis: The Review Petition was examined on two aspects: (i) delay in filing of 208 days without a satisfactory explanation, and (ii) merits of the review. On the delay aspect, the filing period was not adequately explained, and no justification was found to condone the delay. On the merits aspect, the review material was considered and found not to establish any error or ground warranting review of the earlier judgment dated 20.03.2025.
Conclusion: The Review Petition is dismissed on the ground of delay and on merits; the result is adverse to the petitioner and favourable to the assessee.