Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is sustainable for a wrong claim of deduction under section 80-IC when tax liability is higher under section 115JB (MAT) and there is no loss to revenue.
Analysis: The issue requires examination of whether wrong particulars in the return resulting from an eleventh-year claim of section 80-IC deduction led to tax sought to be evaded where tax was ultimately determined and paid on the higher deemed income (book profits) under section 115JB. Relevant considerations include that the assessee filed a revised return withdrawing the incorrect deduction, tax under MAT exceeded tax under normal provisions both before and after revision, and earlier identical penalty proceedings in a related year were deleted by the appellate authority. Precedent establishes that where assessment is finally made on the basis of book profits under section 115JB and tax payable under that provision is higher, the incorrect claim that does not affect the tax payable under section 115JB does not result in tax evasion for the purposes of section 271(1)(c). The absence of loss to revenue and the factual matrix of correction by revised return and higher MAT liability render the levy of penalty unsustainable.
Conclusion: Penalty under section 271(1)(c) is not sustainable; decision is in favour of the assessee and the penalty is deleted.