Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition of Rs. 39,00,000/- made under section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 treating the amount as unexplained cash credit is sustainable in law.
Analysis: Section 68 can be invoked only where a sum is found credited in the books of the assessee for the relevant previous year and the assessee fails to offer a satisfactory explanation regarding the nature and source of such credit. The assessment addition was founded solely on a third-party statement recorded under section 132(4), with no specific identification of the assessee in that statement and without production of the Annexure relied upon. The record establishes that no amount of Rs. 39,00,000/- was found credited in the assessee's books for the year under consideration. There is no independent or corroborative material linking the assessee to receipt of the alleged cash loan, and the appellate order factually misrecorded non-filing of the assessee's reply. These deficiencies undermine the jurisdictional and substantive prerequisites for applying section 68.
Conclusion: The addition of Rs. 39,00,000/- under section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is unsustainable and is deleted; decision is in favour of the assessee.