2026 (2) TMI 336 - AT - Service Tax

Valuation of consulting engineer services under reverse charge: reimbursed expenses excluded from taxable gross amount; appeal dismissed

Valuation of consulting services under the reverse charge mechanism: the Larger Bench precedent held that goods or services supplied free by a service ... Valuation of taxable service - Reverse charge mechanism - Gross amount charged - Nexus between consideration and taxable service - Reimbursable expenses - Rule 5 ultra vires - Whether the value of expenses incurred by the respondent towards the services / facilities provided to the service provider’s specialists are includable in the taxable value of the Consulting Engineer service received by the respondent from the Foreign Service provider {M/s Rosoboron export, Moscow) for the purpose of payment Service Tax under reverse charge mechanism or otherwise - HELD THAT:- Larger Bench in the case of M/s Bhayana Builders Pvt Ltd., & Others. [2013 (9) TMI 294 - CESTAT NEW DELHI-LB], held that the value of goods and materials supplied free of cost by a service recipient to the provider of the taxable construction service, being neither monetary or non-monetary consideration paid by or flowing from the service recipient, accruing to the benefit of service provider, would be outside the taxable value or the gross amount charged, within the meaning of the later expression in Section 67 of the Finance Act, 1994. The reliance placed by the Department on the case of M/s Harveen & Company, [2011 (5) TMI 140 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI], and M/s Aggarwal Colour Advance Photo System, [2011 (8) TMI 291 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI (LB)] are based on different facts, therefore, distinguishable and distinguished. Thus, the issue is no longer res-integra and therefore, no need to interfere in the impugned order. Appeal dismissed. Issues: Whether expenses incurred by the recipient in India for travel, accommodation and related facilities provided to foreign service-provider personnel are includable in the taxable value of the consulting/technical service received from a foreign provider for the purpose of Service Tax under reverse charge mechanism.Analysis: The matter was examined in light of Section 67 (and related charging provisions) and the statutory scheme delimiting taxable value to amounts charged by the service provider as consideration for the taxable service. Precedents construe the value of taxable service as the gross amount charged for that service and require a nexus between the amount and the service provided. Rule 5 of the Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006 has been held to go beyond Section 67 and to be ultra vires; Rule 7 and the effect of the later amendment to Section 67 govern inclusion of reimbursable expenses from the date of amendment. Authorities hold that expenses incurred locally by the recipient for facilitating a foreign provider's visit are not consideration charged by the foreign provider and lack the necessary nexus to the taxable service charged by the provider; such expenses are therefore not part of the gross amount charged for the foreign service prior to the amendment making reimbursable expenses taxable.Conclusion: The expenses for travel, accommodation and related facilities provided by the recipient in India to foreign service-provider personnel are not includable in the taxable value of the consulting/technical service received from the foreign provider for the periods and circumstances considered; the appeal is dismissed and the impugned order is upheld in favour of the recipient (assessee).Ratio Decidendi: For valuation under Section 67, only the gross amount charged by the service provider as consideration for the taxable service (i.e., amounts with a direct nexus to the service charged by the provider) form part of the taxable value; Rule 5 of the Determination of Value Rules is ultra vires to the extent it seeks to include other expenditures incurred by the recipient that are not charged by the provider.