Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the show cause notice dated 11.4.2011 was served within the permissible period under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and whether the impugned order passed pursuant to that notice is sustainable.
Analysis: The impugned adjudication proceeded on a SCN alleged to relate to clandestine removals during 1.4.2007 to 30.6.2007. Service of the SCN was attempted at the assessee's old address and, after postal return, the SCN was affixed on the department's notice board. The complete SCN and its annexures were in fact delivered to the appellants only on dates substantially later, the final relied-upon documents being served well beyond five years from 30.6.2007. Section 11A permits demand by serving an SCN within the normal two-year period and within an extended five-year period only where specified exceptions such as fraud or collusion are shown; no valid service can remedy an expired limitation. Service effected after issuance of the impugned order cannot substitute for service prior to adjudication and does not cure non-compliance with limitation requirements.
Conclusion: The SCN was served beyond the extended five-year limitation period under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944; the impugned order is unsustainable and is set aside, and the appeals are allowed in favour of the assessee.