Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition of Rs. 38,57,530 as unexplained cash deposit can be sustained where books of account are accepted but detailed evidence of cash sales during the demonetisation period is not furnished to the Tribunal.
Analysis: The Tribunal examined (i) the acceptance of the assessee's books of account by the Assessing Officer, (ii) the nature of the business (regular scrap trading with declared quarterly sales), and (iii) the specific factual context of the demonetisation period which affected cash transactions. The Tribunal noted that the return was selected for scrutiny and that cash sales records had been filed but that the assessee failed to provide adequate details despite opportunities and was absent at hearings resulting in ex parte adjudication. Applying the principle that accepted books support the source of receipts but recognising the lack of specific corroborative details, the Tribunal exercised the power to estimate income from the alleged cash sales. The estimation method applied was 8% of the disputed cash deposits to determine taxable income.
Conclusion: The addition sustained in part; the Tribunal reduced the addition by allowing part relief and confirmed an assessed addition of Rs. 3,08,600 (being 8% of Rs. 38,57,530).