Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery should be granted pending appeal by excluding prima facie non-taxable elements from the taxable demand.
Analysis: The demand arose from service tax classification of the appellant's activity as commercial coaching and training under the relevant provisions of the Finance Act, 1994. For the limited purpose of the stay application, the Tribunal accepted the appellant's certification showing a breakup of receipts and held that non-taxable components should not be included in the tax liability at this stage. On that prima facie view, the projected tax exposure was treated as substantially lower than the adjudicated demand.
Conclusion: Waiver of pre-deposit was granted and recovery of the demand was stayed during pendency of the appeal.