Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interim judicial interference should be granted to quash or suspend the show cause notice issued under Section 74(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (and corresponding provisions of the U.P. GST Act, 2017 and Section 20 of the IGST Act, 2017) pending adjudication.
Analysis: The petition was filed at the initiation of adjudication proceedings and no final conclusion has been reached by the adjudicating authority. Investigation including search and recording of recipient statements has taken place and the revenue seeks to rely on those materials and witnesses. Disputed questions of fact and law arise which require full adjudication; the petitioner has avenues within the adjudication to challenge documentary material and to cross-examine witnesses. Given the factual disputes and the need for an adjudicatory process to examine evidence and afford opportunity to test witness statements and documents, the matter is better resolved in the course of statutory adjudication rather than by pre-emptive judicial intervention.
Conclusion: Interim interference is declined and the writ petition is dismissed; the order upholds the continuance of the adjudication proceedings and is therefore against the petitioner and in favour of the revenue.