Denial of exemption under section 11 for delayed Form 10B filing -- tribunal affirms directory nature, exemption retained on substantial compliance.

Denial of charitable exemption for late filing of the audit report in Form No.10B was rejected: ITAT treated the obligation to furnish the audit report with the return as a directory provision, applying the principle of substantial compliance and permitting production of the report subsequently on showing sufficient cause. The tribunal relied on prior decisions, including High Court authority, that consistent case law treats Form No.10B filing as procedural; therefore delay alone will not forfeit exemption and the revenue appeal was dismissed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the assessee-trust is entitled to exemption under section 11 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 despite belated filing of the audit report in Form No.10B (filed after filing the return) and whether failure to e-file Form 10B with the return denies exemption.

Analysis: The Tribunal examined the statutory framework under sections 11, 12, 12A(1)(b) and related rules (including Rule 12(2) and Rule 17B) and considered judicial authority treating the requirement to furnish the audit report in Form 10B with the return as a procedural proviso that is directory in nature. The analysis addressed whether substantial compliance or subsequent production of Form 10B before completion of assessment or on appeal suffices to preserve entitlement to exemption. The Tribunal also considered administrative guidance in CBDT Circular No. 02/2020 and the Revenue's contention regarding mandatory e-filing and the need for condonation under section 119(2), but held that binding judicial decisions treating Form 10B filing as directory control the outcome.

Conclusion: The Tribunal concluded in favour of the assessee and dismissed the Revenue's appeal, holding that the assessee remains entitled to exemption under section 11 despite belated filing of Form 10B.

---