TDS deduction under 194C and 194J - exemptions upheld for small accounting fees and transporters; reassessment notice valid

Accounting fees paid fell below the payable-threshold for TDS under the law governing professional payments, so no TDS liability arose on those sums. For contractor payments under the transport category, the contractor goods carriage exemption applies where the transporter claims ownership of ten or fewer vehicles and furnishes a declaration with PAN, and that exemption was treated as applicable to the relevant year so no TDS was required; the assessing officer is directed to verify PANs and Form 26Q filings and delete resulting additions if records match. Reopening under the limitation extension (TOLA) was held valid for the assessment year.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether reopening of assessment for AY 2014-15 by issuance of notice under section 148/section 147 was valid and within limitation; (ii) Whether additions for non-deduction of TDS under section 194C and section 194J were sustainable given statutory thresholds, exemptions and furnished PANs/declarations; (iii) Whether accounting charges of Rs.60,000 required deduction under section 194J.

Issue (i): Validity of reopening assessment by notice under section 148/section 147 within limitation.

Analysis: The notice under section 148 for AY 2014-15 was issued within the extended limitation period available by statutory extension. The reassessment-related grounds considered by the appellate authority were adjudicated and no error was found requiring interference with the appellate finding on limitation and reopening.

Conclusion: Reopening under section 147/notice under section 148 is valid and within limitation; grounds challenging reopening are dismissed (against the assessee).

Issue (ii): Liability to deduct TDS under section 194C for payments to transporters where aggregate payments and statutory exemptions are in question.

Analysis: Payments to transporters were shown with PANs. For AY under consideration, subsection (6) of section 194C exempts deduction where contractor in business of plying/hiring/leasing goods carriages owns ten or fewer goods carriages and furnishes the required declaration with PAN. The material indicated payments to ten transporters and PANs/declarations were filed; applicability of the exemption and the threshold required verification by the assessing officer.

Conclusion: Ground on section 194C allowed; addition related to these payments is to be deleted after verification of PANs/declarations and compliance (in favour of the assessee insofar as verification confirms exemption).

Issue (iii): Liability to deduct TDS under section 194J on accounting charges of Rs.60,000 paid to two persons.

Analysis: Accounting charges were paid to two persons in amounts of Rs.30,000 each. Section 194J liability arises only when payment to a person in the relevant year exceeds the statutory threshold. The amounts paid to each person did not exceed the threshold applicable for deduction.

Conclusion: No liability to deduct TDS under section 194J on the accounting charges; related addition is deleted (in favour of the assessee).

Final Conclusion: The appeal is partly allowed the challenge to reassessment limitation is dismissed while additions for non-deduction of TDS under sections 194C and 194J are allowed to the extent indicated, subject to verification of PANs/declarations and statutory conditions.

Ratio Decidendi: Reopening under section 147/notice under section 148 must comply with statutory limitation including extensions; exemptions and thresholds in sections 194C and 194J (and the statutory declaration/per PAN requirements) determine liability to deduct TDS and require factual verification by the assessing authority.

---