1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Penalties for late tax filing overturned, case remanded for fresh decision</h1> The Tribunal set aside the penalties imposed on the appellant for late filing of returns and late deposit of service tax, remanding the matter to the ... Penalty - The challenge in the present appeal is only to penalties imposed upon under sections 76 and 77 of the Finance Act. The penalties stand imposed upon him for late filing of returns and for late deposit of service tax. Commissioner (Appeals) confirm the penalty. Held that - since Commissioner (Appeals) had not given any findings on malafide intention of assessee, impugned order was to be set aside. Issues:Penalties imposed under sections 76 and 77 of the Finance Act for late filing of returns and late deposit of service tax.Analysis:The appellant, a registered service provider under the category of 'servicing of motor vehicle service,' challenged the penalties imposed on them. The appellant contended that they had deposited the service tax along with interest on their own without any demand from the department, indicating no intention to evade duty. They cited several decisions to support their argument. The Tribunal noted that the Commissioner (Appeals) did not consider the decisions provided by the appellant or address the mala fide intention aspect. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the Commissioner for a fresh decision in light of the legal principles established in the referenced judgments. The Commissioner was directed to also consider the provisions of section 73(3) of the Finance Act, which state that proceedings can be finalized without a show-cause notice if the tax is deposited before such notice is issued. The appeal was allowed for remand, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive reconsideration of the case.