Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Deputy Commissioner erred in refusing the application for cancellation of out of charge and recall and re-assessment of the bill of entry to correct the unit price under Section 149 read with Section 154 of the Customs Act.
Analysis: The petitioner's application asserted an inadvertent typographical error in the commercial documents and invoices producing an incorrect unit price, and sought correction and re-assessment. The departmental communication refused the request solely by reference to a Supreme Court decision and a standing order, without addressing the petitioner's documentary evidence and pleas. The matter therefore required examination of the petitioner's submitted documents, consideration of whether the error was bona fide, and an opportunity of hearing before a conclusive decision under the cited statutory provisions could be rendered.
Conclusion: The impugned communication is set aside and the matter is remanded to the Deputy Commissioner of Customs, Group III/JNCH, to examine the petitioner's application for cancellation of out of charge and recall and re-assessment of the bill of entry, consider all relevant documents and pleas, grant an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, and pass a reasoned decision expeditiously and within six weeks from presentation of this order.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a statutory application for rectification or re-assessment under Sections 149 and 154 of the Customs Act raises a bona fide clerical error supported by documents, the adjudicating authority must examine the materials, afford an opportunity of hearing and decide on the merits rather than rejecting the application solely by reference to precedent or administrative instruction.