Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in the presence of an Export Obligation Discharge Certificate (EODC) issued by the DGFT evidencing fulfillment of export obligation in respect of goods imported under the EPCG scheme, the Customs authorities can confirm demand, confiscate the goods and impose redemption fine without prior adjudication or cancellation of the EODC by DGFT.
Analysis: The Tribunal examined whether the EODC issued by the competent licensing authority conclusively evidenced discharge of export obligation and whether Customs had jurisdiction to re-open or disregard that certificate in the absence of any cancellation or adjudication by DGFT. The analysis considered DGFT clarifications regarding use of imported vehicles and inclusion of related foreign exchange earnings towards discharge of export obligation, and subsequent Tribunal and High Court/Supreme Court authorities addressing relative jurisdictions of DGFT and Customs. The conclusion in the cited authorities that where EODC remains valid and uncancelled, Customs cannot sit in judgment over the certificate and cannot confirm demand or impose penalties without DGFT action was applied to the facts at hand.
Conclusion: The demand, confiscation and imposition of redemption fine by Customs are not sustainable in the absence of any adjudication or cancellation of the EODC by DGFT; decision set aside and appeal allowed in favour of the assessee.