Inclusion of freight and loading charges in excise assessable value; Tribunal rejects Section 11D demand and allows appeal

Invoices during the exemption period did not record or collect any amount as excise duty; therefore constructive collection under Section 11D does not arise and the demand under that provision was set aside. The Tribunal found the majority of clearances were ex-factory with transportation charged and recovered separately, so inclusion of freight, loading and unloading in assessable value on a FOR basis was not established; consequently the related demand and invocation of extended period failed. Payments had been made but returns were filed late; the Tribunal condoned delay for the SSI unit and allowed the appeals.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether amount of Rs.66,83,256/- is recoverable under Section 11D of the Central Excise Act, 1944; (ii) Whether freight and loading/unloading charges are includable in the assessable value and differential duty of Rs.28,75,181/- is recoverable.

Issue (i): Whether Section 11D/11D(1A) applies so as to require deposit of amounts alleged to have been collected as excise duty during the SSI exemption period.

Analysis: Section 11D/11D(1A) requires that an amount must have been collected in any manner as representing excise duty to be payable to the Government. Where invoices do not show any amount specifically as excise duty and only show an all-inclusive price during the exemption period, Section 11D is not attracted. Prior decisions and statutory amendment history distinguish between collection shown as duty and mere retention of consolidated prices while enjoying exemption; non-passage of benefit (profiteering) does not, by itself, create liability under Section 11D.

Conclusion: Section 11D does not apply and the demand of Rs.66,83,256/- cannot be sustained.

Issue (ii): Whether transportation, freight and loading/unloading charges are part of the assessable value for the purpose of excise duty for the supplies in question.

Analysis: Inclusion of freight and allied charges in assessable value depends on place of removal and contractual terms. For clearances that are genuinely ex-factory with transport arranged by or paid for on behalf of the buyer and shown separately, transportation costs are excludable from assessable value under the valuation provisions. Revenue did not place evidence to show that clearances (except specified contracts) were on FOR basis; sample invoices supported ex-factory treatment. Invocation of extended limitation for a question of valuation/interpretation without clear suppression is not sustainable.

Conclusion: Freight and loading/unloading charges are not includable in the assessable value for the majority of clearances; the differential duty demand of Rs.28,75,181/- cannot be sustained.

Final Conclusion: The impugned demand and penalties are set aside and the appeals are allowed.

Ratio Decidendi: Section 11D/11D(1A) is attracted only where an amount is specifically collected or shown as representing excise duty; an all-inclusive price during an exemption period without a distinct amount shown as duty does not create liability under Section 11D, and assessable value excludes transportation charges where place of removal is ex-factory and transport costs are separately recovered.

---