Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner is entitled to restoration/revocation of cancellation of GST registration under Section 30 of the CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 23 of the CGST Rules, 2017, where all outstanding tax liabilities have been discharged.
Analysis: The Court examined Chapter VI of the CGST Act, specifically Section 29 (cancellation or suspension of registration), Section 30 (revocation of cancellation of registration) and Rule 23 of the CGST Rules, 2017 governing applications for revocation. The provisions require that revocation may be granted subject to prescribed conditions and that applications be decided after giving an opportunity of being heard; Rule 23 prescribes timelines, conditions for filing revocation applications and obligations to furnish returns and pay dues. On the facts, the record showed the petitioner had paid all tax liabilities and the Revenue conceded no outstanding dues remained. The Court relied on consistent authorities holding that keeping registration cancelled despite discharge of dues is not in the interest of Revenue and that authorities are empowered and obliged to revoke cancellation where conditions are met.
Conclusion: The petitioner is entitled to revocation of cancellation and restoration of GST registration; the writ petition is allowed in favour of the assessee.